-    Make Money Online

Would Obama Allow a Terror Attack to Save His Presidency? Bob Woodward’s New Book Speculates

Posted by Ed Krassenstein on Sep 22nd, 2010 and filed under Featured News. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback to this entry

Obama terror attackAs time goes on, and the 2012 election gets all that much closers, republicans must find a way to put a bad light on the Barack Obama Presidential Administration.

Bob Woodward has recently released book “Obama’s Wars“, which is his 16th book. Woodward, the Washington Post journalist, who covered Watergate had an interview with Obama.

According to “Obama’s Wars”, Obama said, “We’ll do everything we can to prevent it, but even a 9/11, even the biggest attack ever.. we absorbed it and we are stronger.”

A lot of people are taking these comments to mean that Obama is saying that the United States can handle a terror attack, simply to instigate potential terrorists. Well known talk show host Michael Savage has an opinion on why Obama is making these remarks.

Savage said, “The bottom line here is that Americans don’t believe in President Obama’s leadership. He has to find some way between now and November of demonstrating that he is a leader who can command confidence and, short of a 9/11 event or an Oklahoma City bombing, I can’t think of how he could do that.”

These suggestions that Obama is willing to let American suffer a terror attack, just to save his presidency seems to be rather outlandish. Just a few weeks ago we heard rumors that Obama doesn’t really care if he wins the 2012 election, as he has other political goals in mind. Bob Woodward never claimed that an Obama terror attack scenario is what his the current administration needs or hopes for. He just talked about how Obama believes that America is a strong country; one that can handle a terror attack of huge proportions and still stand strong.

It is the remarks of people like Michael Savage, and blogger Warner Todd Huston who create these rumors. Huston responded to the Woodward books claim with the following:

But somehow I can’t escape the feeling that this flippancy comes from Obama’s envy that George W.Bush got a “big event” to make his presidency while all Obama has gotten is a bad economy, massive job loss, and dissatisfaction at every level of society. No big disaster that he could make his nut on. Heck he even wasted the BP Oil spill with weeks of inactivity.

I can just see him, green with envy that Bush got that big moment. If ONLY Hussein could get a big attack of his own, why THEN he’d show the world what a great president he could be! If only we could “absorb” a big one like 9/11, eh Barrack? And we’d take it…. and take it….

Now, remember the old days when we had a president that was willing to take the fight to the terrorists? Now we have a president that is waiting to “absorb” attacks on us, HERE. And we take it…

Obama continues to leave troops on foreign soil even though he’s pulled most out of Iraq.

What do you think? Are these pundits fabricating rumors just to hurt the Obama Administration, or are they on to something? Would Obama really instigate terrorists in order to save his presidency?

If you are interested in reading Bob Woodward’s new book “Obama’s Wars”, you can purchase it Here.

Share
blog comments powered by Disqus